Daisy asks, “In light of the recent news articles about homeschooling families who have flown under the radar and abused their children, do you think there should be more government oversight of homeschooling?”
My experiences haven’t convinced me that either system is worse or better for protecting children from (or leaving them subject to) child abuse as a whole.
I don’t think homeschooling is to blame for this. Not in the slightest. I think officially enrolling a child in homeschooling may provide a simpler means in the long term of hiding extensive child abuse, but a public or private family could easily withdraw their student from the school in the name of moving (to another school, district, town, or state) and just not re-enroll — most states don’t have the resources to follow up with every student, especially if that child isn’t using any government services that would keep him/her fresh on their radar.
Children enrolled in public or private school are victims of abuse every day, too. It goes unnoticed or unreported. Children can fall through the cracks anywhere, long absences can be excused, transient families can easily slip out of the sight and minds of the school system. Just because a system is full of mandated reporters, it doesn’t mean that they will notice the abuse. It doesn’t mean that they will take it seriously even if they do. I went to public school with an individual who was abused extensively (both sexually and physically) by a parent throughout the time we attended school together. I had no idea and I don’t think most of the teachers did, either. Until we install cameras or human monitors in every family’s home (homeschooling or public schooling) for 24-hour “oversight,” we can’t catch every incident of abuse.
The important common factor I’ve noticed in many of these deaths is not that the children are schooled at home, but that the parents adhere to a strict set of religious beliefs, keep themselves isolated from anyone outside their insular religious community (in fact, they’re encouraged to cut themselves off from people with differing beliefs who might lead them astray), and follow supposedly Bible-based parenting “guides” such as To Train Up a Child by the heartless, conscience-less, and utterly godless (beyond a belief in their own righteousness) creatures, the Pearls.
Religious extremism and blind obeisance to a dangerous parenting method killed those children, not homeschooling. Those same crimes, committed under the instruction of the Pearls’ books, could have been perpetrated by the parents if their children had been enrolled in private religious schools. They could have been perpetrated on children enrolled in public school, though I think it’s unlikely that these parents would have enrolled their children in public school. Government oversight of homeschooling wouldn’t have changed the fact that these parents believed God wanted them to beat their children until they obeyed perfectly and cheerfully. The Pearls specifically instruct parents to beat their children with 1/4 inch flexible PVC pipe, because it hurts, but the marks fade quickly. Child abusers often develop methods to disguise the abuse they are committing and the Pearls teach parents how to be meticulous child abusers…and that the only way they can be right with God and raise godly children is through systematically breaking the child. Unfortunately, some children aren’t broken as easily as others, so the beatings continue.
You know where government oversight might help? Through investigation of the dangerous cult of child abuse led by the Pearls (or other churches espousing child abuse). I was shocked that they were NOT listed on the SPLC’s “Hate Group” watch list, because the Pearls clearly hate children. They also hate women, but they seem to view women as large children who need the same degree of abuse and mastery. You want to reduce the number of deaths in homeschooled children? Start investigating the churches that hold TTUAC “parenting” classes (I use “parenting” in quotes because it’s more like “prison guarding” than parenting). Look for the churches that are telling their congregation that the only way to be right with God is through frequent application of the “rod.” Look for the families that are gobbling up the advice to beat their children as a path to righteousness. The parents who believe their child should be beaten until she pronounces a word correctly (because Michael Pearls says that sort of willfulness deserves a beating) will beat their child whether she’s in public school, private school, or homeschool. If the government can investigate the FLDS community because of potential child abuse, surely they could investigate the Cult of Michael Pearl. They can investigate child abuse if someone reports it. REPORT IT! There’s even a precedent for investigating churches/pastors who are espousing child abuse. You CAN investigate the church and its leaders if that church is telling you to break the law…or break your child.
Most homeschoolers (religious or secular) do not beat their children and many, many abused children are attending school within the public system. Oversight applied to all homeschoolers won’t catch this abuse, because abusers are often sneaky. They’re careful. Do you think that a child will be covered in bruises on check-in day? Of course not. Pearl-trained/abused children are squeaky clean and perfectly polite when they’re marched out for company. If you want to stop these abuse death, you have to go to the source. Stop the abusers from teaching other parents how to abuse. If you belong to a church that espouses the Pearl methods, speak up against the wrongness and danger of these methods. If your church is considering starting Pearl (or Ezzo, or other religiously-based child abuse classes) speak up. Say, “NO, this is NOT the way to God! This is the way to kill or seriously injure your child.” If they continue with the classes, keep your eyes peeled for signs of abuse and turn the abusers in in. You may not be a legally-mandated reporter, but you are a morally-obligated one.









It’s nice to see that you are feeling sufficiently better to be blogging
(Oh and I couldn’t agree more)
I still feel pretty awful. Pneumonia is a long road to recovery.
I do think this is a church issue. Not sure I’d advocate outside regulation of churches any more than I would advocate outside regulation of homeschoolers, but something absolutely MUST change. (I can’t say that strongly enough). There is absolutely a culture within the church community to keep abuse quiet (if the Catholic abuse fiasco wasn’t proof enough of that).
When hubby & I knew a child in our Sunday school class was being beaten by her mother, we were told by the church hierarchy that “they” would deal with it by counseling the parents in house. (No thanks, hubby as a mandated reporter, reported it anyway). Heck, my own Dad (a minister) was hauled before his denominational hierarchy and given a slap on the wrist for his behavior. The theory being that his recruiting people into the kingdom of heaven was more important then whether or not he was abusing his daughters.
The expectation is that Christians don’t have “problems”. Members are afraid to tell their pastors they are struggling, afraid to seek out counseling for fear of being ostracized. Families desperately in need of help just told that if they better follow the Pearls advice everything will be great.
Sorry, I’m going off, but it hits close to home and makes me sick.
See, I think if abuse is happening on a systemic level, the government does need to get involved with the church, just like they’d need to get involved if it were happening systemically in a prison, school, national organization, etc. If a group or organization is a training ground for child abusers, I don’t care if it’s a house of God or a house of pancakes.
Yeah, I hear you, but how do you regulate it? The best thing would be for churches to wake up and regulate themselves instead of hiding it. That sounds familiar though (eyes rolling).
I don’t know. It does get crazy. Abusers know how to avoid the system and frankly the church is a great place to hide.
1. Natural distrust of government interference.
2. Plenty of folks who avoid “secular” anything (from sports teams to schools to counselors). The children don’t even get the opportunity to find help outside the world of the church.
3. Natural tendency to assume an abuser just needs God to work in their life and He’ll change them.
4. Corporal punishment is the NORM.
5. Male centric.
6. Reluctance to expose someone else’s “private sin.”
7. Children, women, men taught that higher education is BAD.
8. Families taught that stress in their life is due to God’s punishment or their own sin. (not doctrinal correct but taught in some churches).
9. Families taught that church leadership is put in place by God and not to be questioned.
Geez, I could go on, but you get the point. I just don’t know how you would regulate it without crossing over the freedom of religion line. I’m open to dialogue about it though.
Churches are incapable of regulating themselves. I think that’s been proven time and time again.
Corporal punishment in the form of spanking w/ a hand may be normal, but whipping a child with a flexible pipe is NOT normal. States have standards for what is and isn’t abuse. If a church leader or church class is teaching things in violations of the state’s standards for CPS involvement, I think that church needs to be investigated by CPS and possibly have its tax-exempt status revoked.
I agree. Just wonder how they’d do that effectively. Guess I don’t believe CPS is all that effective either. BTDT when I was a kid. Anyway, sorry I’m monopolizing your blog comments. I’d love to nail every bastard who stands in church shaking hands and smiling all while his children know what is coming later.
The Mama and I once had a conversation about a family I saw in a Culver’s in Michigan. Dad, Mom, 8 or so kids all looking a 10-18 months a part — everyone perfectly pressed and dressed, children absolutely angelic. I overheard Dad discussing Titus 2 with another family. When the family left, the children stood up and go in line by height. I told The Mama about it and she said, “Yes, they act that way because they’re probably beaten if they don’t.”